Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 12:07 pm
Judges Graber and Gould write concurring opinions that express various points, both of which articulate a slightly different analysis than the majority opinion. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:15 am
The provision at issue allows the lenders to declare an event of default and accelerate the debt in the event that a majority of the Healthways board during a period of 24 months is comprised of “non-continuing” directors, including directors initially nominated as a result of an actual or threatened proxy contest. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
The majority, by contrast, resolves the case on a different ground.Neat stuff. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
” Although the Court’s ruling in FAA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:25 am
Like the majority and the dissent in the panel decision, the petition does not directly address the main difficulty raised by this case—namely, how should we apply the design patent “primary reference” test for multi-article designs? [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:54 am
The post Water-rights dispute <em>Florida v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:46 pm
But the majority has a point as well. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
There is much confusion in the public about the difference between a trade secret and a patent. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am
On January 18, a series of 16 amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court, the vast majority of which urged the nation’s highest court to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and limit the application of the Rogers test to clearly artistic works and exclude consumer products that happened to have some humorous expression. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am
On January 18, a series of 16 amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court, the vast majority of which urged the nation’s highest court to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and limit the application of the Rogers test to clearly artistic works and exclude consumer products that happened to have some humorous expression. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:15 am
(Opinion in Feldmeier v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
There had been some speculation that Geier v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
Wrigley Jr. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:59 am
Questions about particular documents, such as “Does the Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
__ Eric’s Comments: The majority never uses the term “sign-in-wraps” (yay!) [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
In Kullar v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:52 am
Wade; Mississippi filed a defense of its 15-week abortion ban Thursday, marking the next step in a landmark case that pushes the conservative-majority high court to scrap caselaw upholding abortion rights. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am
The court order laid out the following restrictions: Defendant Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., is permanently enjoined from: a. enforcing or threatening to enforce in any court or in any other manner the exclusivity clause in its form contract with major league baseball players; b. entering into or seeking to enter into any contract with any major or minor league baseball player which reserves to Topps any exclusive right to sell that player’s picture in any form or in combination… [read post]
