Search for: "People v Goode" Results 7741 - 7760 of 20,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 12:19 am by David Benenfeld
While many people can help keep their older cars in good shape by getting their vehicles regularly maintained, many older vehicles do not have the technologies that newer cars do to assist drivers in avoiding crashes. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm by Justin Walsh
You’ve seen one post today on how Jim Johnson will put profits over people. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:42 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Under the normal rule, such discussions are confidential because it is good when people have “full, frank and free” discussions about settlement. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:49 am by Will Baude
After my post defending aspects of the Court's opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. (14-1513); and Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
 Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:30 am by Andy
For the IPEC, although undoubtedly the correct findings were made, this sort of rushed and half prepared case does not serve as a good advertisement for justice, or as a good use of the court's time. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
The good news for me is that I don't really know anything about patent infringement litigation in China, so I'm unlikely to be wrong. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
“On Monday, news washed up that this "famous" sari of the Nobel laureate nun, who died in 1997, has been trademarked to prevent "unfair" use by people for commercial purposes. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:29 am
 This Kat however reminds readers that he was all in favour of the American football team changing its name, irrespective of whether the name was disparaging or not, on the basis that a substantial and increasing number of people think it is disparaging -- and it's better to rebrand while the going is good than to wait and watch while a once-valuable brand becomes increasingly toxic. [read post]