Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 5:25 am
And here's my summary of his dicta:Howes v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:55 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
FEC, Burwell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm
Because I am teaching a course this fall on the fourteenth amendment, I’ve been meaning to post on the upcoming big case, Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
In EMAK Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
In Lickiss v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
The Roberts opinion joins McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Here, in the Reif v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to hear oral arguments in November 2024 in Teva v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
In his dissent last term in Begay v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently filed a memorandum decision regarding an appeal in the case of State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
A presidential power of monumental proportions: Does the Antiquities Act permit the review and revision of national monuments or can the president steal your land? [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
A presidential power of monumental proportions: Does the Antiquities Act permit the review and revision of national monuments or can the president steal your land? [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
The consideration that the power invested in the Secretary of State by article 4(1) – a power to detain without trial and potentially for a limitless period- was a momentous one and provided insight into Parliament’s intention that such a crucial decision should be made by the Secretary of State personally. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:12 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:14 am
As acknowledged by an opinion issued by the California Attorney General’s office, the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
