Search for: "State v. Bui"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 9,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
The insurance-buying community has responded enthusiastically, as noted in online reports of year-on-year growth of cyber-risk insurance premiums.[1] But how much third-party liability protection are insureds really getting from these new cyber-risk insurance products? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 1:47 pm
Both parties cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
In Gastelum v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:41 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Majors v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Constitution allowed Congress to empower head of agency to decide how much yearly funding it would receive up to a cap. 22-448_o7jp.pdf (supremecourt.gov) KSR test for obviousness of patents on inventions also applies to patents on designs. 21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf (uscourts.gov) Whether buyer could escape promise to buy merger target turned on unclear meaning of “promulgate” in context of SEC rules. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:11 am
” Parloff notes that the most relevant precedent is one from twelve years ago in Texas, Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
If you care about federalism, you should buy it and read it and -- I hope -- come away unconvinced by its argument. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
Coffin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
And as Justice Scalia pointed out in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:09 am
The Court’s holding in Scott’s case that slaves were not citizens and could not sue in the courts later earned Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am
Genovese is a reminder that New York’s LLC Law, unlike LLC statutes in a number of other states, has no default rule authorizing member expulsion. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am
Genovese is a reminder that New York’s LLC Law, unlike LLC statutes in a number of other states, has no default rule authorizing member expulsion. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
United States and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
