Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 7741 - 7760
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See also Coffin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm
“[R]estraints imposed on government to pry into the lives of the citizen go to the essence of a democratic state” (R. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
. § 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:30 pm
Hartman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
§ 512.[4] Viacom Int’l Inc., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:57 am
Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Young v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
R v Waya, heard 27 – 30 March 2012. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
R. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
AND CHARLES R. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 1:46 am
Sovmots Investments Ltd v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:25 pm
In particular, Fam C § 297(b) states "a domestic partnership shall be established in California when both persons file a Declaration of Domestic Partnership with the Secretary of State pursuant to this division. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]
