Search for: "State v. Country" Results 7741 - 7760 of 26,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by Ellen Marrus
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
In addition to preventing admission to the United States by individuals from select countries, provisions of the original order included references to permanent resident aliens—that is, non-citizens with lawful status, sometimes referred to as green card holders. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In an analysis for The Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog, Bernard Grofman and German Feierherd look at how other countries conduct legislative redistricting as the Supreme Court prepares to consider “the much-anticipated Gill v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:57 am by Charles Gallmeyer
The ruling comes as many states across the country, including Georgia and North Dakota, have enacted recent legislation attempting to narrow Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Internationally, countries shifted from taxing tangible personal property: across the 36 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only seven countries levy taxes on personal property: Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.[5] Over time, the American personal property tax base was eroded as states provided exemptions for different types of TPP. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:03 am by LTA-Editor
The state requires taxpayer self-reporting because the Supreme Court held, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am by Amanda Pickens
October 25, 2017) (action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by plaintiffs who are “temporary workers” of defendant, which provides temporary contract employee across the country, alleging they were not compensated for work in excess of 40 hours per week and, additionally, were not paid wages due to them on regular paydays.) [read post]