Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 7741 - 7760 of 8,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog continue to be available. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Health Insurance: BLUE SHIELD DENIES COVERAGE FOR MENTALLY ILL KIDS, SUIT SAYS, Daniel F. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twenty fourth day of June in the year two thousand nine. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:23 am
Louis Sewer District (District) by the United States and the State of Missouri under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
The dissenting opinion states, "Instead, the CCAs will have to resort to the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
The Federal government cited the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), Section 34(1) [10], which reads among other points of order, that refusal can be based on whether, "e) engaging in acts of violence that would or might endanger the lives or safety of persons in Canada; or (f) being a member of an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]