Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 13,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
The case is Poquito Mas Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
K.G.M.A. was registered for and assigned to an elementary school in Celaya. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Notice of the divorce action was sent to Sanchez in Colombia by registered mail. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Bar Assn. v. [read post]
"Adultery, including adulterous cohabitation, is not prosecuted. Religious cohabitation, however..."
14 Dec 2013, 10:05 am
Says federal judge Clark Waddoups in Brown v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:20 pm
Tice v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:20 pm
During oral arguments in the case of Appling v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
The CEO moved to dismiss the complaint against her, arguing that the company was a limited liability company incorporated in New Jersey and registered in Philadelphia. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 11:19 am
Beckon Employee Blogging Risks Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Oney v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Oney v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
” (MCL 500.3163(1)) (NOTE: No Fault benefits collected as a result of “3163 certification” will be limited to $500,000 if the “out-of-state resident was not an occupant of a motor vehicle registered in this state. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
An order to cease and desist from violations of a non-scienter based rule would not trigger disqualification under Rule 506(d)(1)(v), even if the rule is promulgated under a scienter-based provision of law (e.g. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 1:25 pm
It is critical to search, not only state and federal registers, but also unregistered use. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So concludes today’s Silvester v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
And who on planet Earth would ever think up a question like this, if it wasn't for the persistent attempts of the CJEU and Europe's finest IP lawyers to categorise confusion as a state of law rather than as a state of fact?]. [read post]
