Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 11,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
The Agreement states in part: 'Each party waives the provisions of California Probate Code Section 143 and California Family Code Section 1615 relating to financial disclosures. . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
We'll see if the seven actual justices on the California Supreme Court agree. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:54 am
On remand, Appellant modified his attorney fee motion to also request a seven-percent prejudgment interest on the fee award. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:44 am
They base their conclusion on the landmark 1922 Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Reyes: Defining Prosecutorial Misconduct - This post outlines United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
In Golan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Thomas, the Court reversed the decision of the Eleventh Circuit by a vote of seven to two, holding that a death row inmate had shown requisite “cause” to excuse his procedural default, which occurred after his lawyer missed a filing deadline in state court. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:51 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
Take United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
She calls attention to U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:56 am
By a vote of seven to two, the Court reversed the decision of the Eleventh Circuit, holding that death row inmate Cory Maples has shown the requisite “cause” to excuse his procedural default, which occurred when his lawyer missed a filing deadline in state court. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Consequently, Mr Ahmad has remained in detention for over seven years without charge or trial. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
The application, Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
