Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 7741 - 7760
of 8,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(RelatIP) United Kingdom Tweaks to the UK patent system (IPKat) UK IPO announces 100th Patent Office Opinion issued since s74A – or is it 98? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
For all of the reasons discussed here, here, and here, STL has not been a fan of the United States Olympic Committee’s efforts to enforce its near monopoly rights in the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Introduction On August 31, 2009, The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) and Marvel Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
As explained in the court's opinion in Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 12:19 pm
In short, Cordeck was subcontracted to Construction Systems, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:45 am
The Federal Circuit, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
After the action was filed, F&R recorded its Security Agreement against WYD’s thirteen trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”).F&R eventually was granted summary judgment in its state court breach of contract action and the court awarded F&R $348,651.18 [ed. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:28 pm
On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, issued a substantial class certification opinion in Cartwright, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:35 pm
In NTP, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
This article will provide an overview of the statutory framework of Section 363(f) and analysis of an opinion issued by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") for the Ninth Circuit in the case entitled Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
Perry, Donna Rosinski Kauz, Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:15 am
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d at 407; United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
See Miller, 335 F.3d at 899; United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Dep’t of Housing & Urban Dev. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
