Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7741 - 7760 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
In 2005, while in the United States, Anthimos met and married Respondent Aalison, a United States citizen. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:17 am by Joel R. Brandes
As the district court found, Ermini and Vittori leased a house in the United States and put their house in Italy on the market; enrolled the children in school and extracurricular activities in the United States; planned to open a business in the United States; prepared to move all of their belongings to the United States; and shifted Daniele's all-important medical care and treatment to the United States.… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 1:50 pm by Andrea Gold
On July 7, 2014, the Fifth Circuit decided an interlocutory appeal in United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:01 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Under the test in Morrison, a transaction involving foreign citizens, foreign companies, and foreign behavior could be brought in the United States if the sale happened to close in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am by Donald Thompson
 In United States v Davis, 726 F3d 357 [2nd Cir 2013], defendant was federally charged with assaulting another inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which the government alleged was “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” an element of that offense. [read post]