Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 44,319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
If he thinks the prison at Guantanamo still has a role in national security or that it provides some benefit to the United States, I welcome his views. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm
” Having said that, it agrees with Germany that the expropriation exception does not apply when a foreign state is accused of taking its own citizens’ property. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Hungary v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
In fact, Apple and Intel are suing Softbank-owned Fortress Investment in the Northern District of California, and one Fortress front named Uniloc has made such procedural moves in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
(See Dunlap v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
(See Dunlap v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:32 am
Brief for the United States at 13. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am
The consideration for the contract is Petitioner’s agreement not to use or register the NAKED trademark for condoms in the United States and Respondent’s agreement not to use or register the NUDE trademark for condoms. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Some troopers said the unit “does not accept females. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9] There are two Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:37 pm
Brohl – in which the court allowed a lawsuit challenging a state-tax reporting requirement to proceed – does not apply, because there was no tax there and here there is a tax. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, covering Pennsylvania and nearby states, has recently departed from this line of authority. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
” Durham v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
