Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 31,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm
., a non-disclosure agreement [NDA] or other reasonable protections are not in place). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
This common law protection worked pretty well until the early 1990s, when online services emerged, carrying far more content than the average bookstore or newsstand. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
R. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
Indeed, in Commission v France [Katpost here], the CJEU considered that ebooks may be classified as services, rather than goods under the VAT Directive. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
A particular emphasis is placed on state approaches to GILTI, which has often confounded lawmakers and revenue officials. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:55 pm
In her majority opinion, Judge Jennifer Elrod ruled that the individual mandate is now unconstitutional because, with the repeal of the attached penalty, it can no longer be considered a tax, which is the only reason why it was upheld by the Supreme Court in its 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:18 am
Walter Nixon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am
On the other hand, it relies on a lot of well-worn First Amendment precedent. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Miron v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
Well, the new NDAA will simplify that definition considerably, because it will eliminate the language “outside the [DoDIN] to defeat an ongoing or imminent threat. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am
V. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
The Chief Justice might well rule one out of order. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
As we argue in the book, the Warren Court confronted difficult issues of precedent, but did so in a manner that fulfilled the most central reasons for having a Supreme Court in the first place. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
” Kilburn v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Following the STJ decision, the STF ruled this year in Oliveira v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
We aim to attract established scholars as well as researchers whose work on the topic is not yet out in print. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:50 am
The justices also denied review in Smyth v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 11:06 pm
Which is all very well when this process of commercialisation actually takes place, and there is a genuine investment to be protected. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
Christmas may be the time for trifles (like the Christmas trifle pictured right), but the Courts are not the place for them. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
