Search for: "ANDREW DOE" Results 7761 - 7780 of 9,602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 10:26 am
Recently, Andrew Ross Sorkin, New York Times, dug into this story with a [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:44 am by D. Kappos
”   The article was based on an interview with three Supervisory Patent Examiners (SPEs): David Ometz, John Cottingham and Andrew Koenig. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The National Australia Bank case does underscore how significant it is when the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Reputation, as Lord Nicholls explained in Reynolds v Times Newspapers, does matter, and not merely for its service to the individual concerned: ‘Reputation is an integral and important part of the dignity of the individual. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by INFORRM
The fact that there may be a preferable remedy available does not mean that the damages remedy is somehow ineffective. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:01 pm
That Jeff Skilling did not predict that Enron would fail under those conditions does not make him a criminal. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Section 10(b) does not punish deceptive conduct, but only deceptive conduct "in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:09 am by Andres
This is just one of the various books that one could class as the New Luddism, which includes authors like Nick Carr and Andrew Keen. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm by Ilya Somin
On the former point, this article by leading property rights historian Jim Ely does a good job of summarizing the relevant historical evidence. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by INFORRM
Alastair Mullis is a Professor of Law at the University of East Anglia, and (with Andrew Scott) the joint author of the paper “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Andrews, C.J., issued dissenting opinion. **552 *508 York, McRae & York, Michael D. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
Jackson, as does Clifford Marks at the WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
As Andrew Copson, BHA Chief Executive, comments:"The government’s statement makes clear that religious discrimination in admissions is here to stay, going against what was implied in the Coalition Agreement, and against an explicit Liberal Democrat policy, that no new schools would be able to discriminate in admissions. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Andrew Light shifted the focus to the international arena, giving a fairly optimistic assessment of climate negotiations and the Copenhagen Accord. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:04 pm by Stewart Baker
So what authority does the bill propose to give the government? [read post]