Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 7761 - 7780 of 8,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Singer; JD 2000 Harvard University; ; Colorado Supreme Court; Civil Procedure, Judicial Process New England Law Tigran Eldred; JD 1990 Fordham University; Lawyering Program New York University; United States Court of Appeals; Criminal Law, Professional Responsibility New York Law School Melynda Barnhart; JD 2001 Northeastern University; LLM 2009 New York University, LLM 2010 Temple University; Abraham Freedman Fellow Temple University; Legal Research and Writing,… [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm by lawmrh
” Relying on the California Court, the Arizona Supreme Court stated, “We find the reasoning of Howard compelling. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:19 am by lawmrh
A recent New Jersey opinion on virtual offices from the state’s supreme court-appointed Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, Committee on Attorney Advertising will get the attention of other jurisdictions, especially Arizona’s. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by Lawrence Solum
In 1982, the Supreme Court weighed in on this issue through its seminal decision, Sporhase v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:16 pm by Judicial Watch Blog
Among them is Liu’s commencement speech to UC Berkeley Law, his participation in a panel entitled “What the 2008 Election Will Mean for the Supreme Court” and his participation in a presentation entitled “The Fate of Affirmative Action from the O’Connor Court to the Roberts Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:38 am by Breyer Law Offices
In Arizona, the Supreme Court has ruled that punitive damages are appropriate for drunk drivers who cause accidents. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
"A fight over a second Obama Supreme Court nominee could rev up both Democratic and Republican fundraising machines for the November election, even though Stevens' replacement by a liberal-leaning justice would not alter the court's ideological balance.Still no Floridian.... [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am by Susan Brenner
Supreme Court’s decision in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Arizona 2010). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm by tjsllibrary
Among the attributes that make this study aid an excellent resource: [...]Unique, time-tested Examples & Explanations pedagogy —Combines textual material with well-written and comprehensive examples, explanations, and questions to test students’ comprehension of the materials and provide practice in applying information to fact patterns; recent Supreme Court cases on the insanity defense and the diminished capacity defense (such as Arizona v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:36 am by John Day
App. 1982), the Arizona Court of Appeals held that while ‘there is no liability when the defendant has done nothing more than legitimately utilize the process for its authorized purposes, even though with bad intentions,’ an action for abuse of process may lie where ‘the ulterior or collateral purpose involved [is] to expose the injured party to excessive attorney’s fees and legal expenses. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:13 pm by lawmrh
The two chairs were supported by three staff lawyers from the Arizona Supreme Court and a court administrative person. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:38 am by Lauren Ellerman
I salute his attorney and hope more courts will do the same. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:45 pm by Administrator
Back in 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:14 pm by Bridget Crawford
Supreme Court clerks who clerked for six different Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
Judge Mary Murguia of the federal District Court of Arizona was nominated to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm by Chuck Peterson
On appeal the question is whether that ruling stands in view of the United States Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 11:32 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court relied on language in the United States Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. [read post]