Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 22,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2018, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a 1966 case called United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:59 am
See Bader v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
After the Dolphins‘ staff learned of a voicemail message that center Richie Incognito had left for Martin months earlier, in which he used a racist slur and made vulgar taunts, the team quickly suspended Incognito. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
After the Dolphins‘ staff learned of a voicemail message that center Richie Incognito had left for Martin months earlier, in which he used a racist slur and made vulgar taunts, the team quickly suspended Incognito. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that requires licensed centers to post notices to inform patients about the availability of state-funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion, and requires unlicensed centers to disclose that they do not provide medical services. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court questions California law requiring antiabortion centers to disclose that the state provides abortion services. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:00 pm
Reporting on the arguments, Politico said in part:A surprisingly broad array of justices expressed serious concerns that the Reproductive FACT Act intrudes on First Amendment rights, by requiring such centers to include in their ads a state-provided notice in as many as 13 languages offering contact information about abortion services and other options. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:46 am
For more information, please choose to follow the case further at International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
Marsh, Goldman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:12 pm
”Discussions of technical arbitration issues send me into a deep state of MEGO. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
Ardan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
Title I also reminds the secretary of his or her obligation to provide assistance to state and local officials in securing election infrastructure. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
and Auer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that, among other things, requires licensed centers to post notices to inform patients about the availability of state-funded family-planning services, including abortion; he notes that although the “justices won’t be dealing with broader questions about the right to an abortion, the outcome could affect not only California’s law, but those in other states that… [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
Eventually, she ran for the Arizona State Senate and in 1973 was the first woman to be any state’s Majority leader. [read post]
