Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 7761 - 7780 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
The Board found the language of Section 2(b) to be “plain and clear on its face. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
The indictment brings a prosecution for wire fraud, as well as three different CFAA claims: computer fraud (§ 1030(a)(4)), obtaining information through unauthorized access to a protected computer (§ 1030(a)(2)), and computer damage (§ 1030(a)(5)(B)). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
The indictment brings a prosecution for wire fraud, as well as three different CFAA claims: computer fraud (§ 1030(a)(4)), obtaining information through unauthorized access to a protected computer (§ 1030(a)(2)), and computer damage (§ 1030(a)(5)(B)). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Ten years later, the employee made a lateral move in the company. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:43 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
The more popular supply side models include implementing fees based on (a) Use over a certain free-floor, (b) the supply of literature in convenient formats, and (c) for additional value added. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:45 am by Swaraj Paul Barooah
(a) reasonable requirements of the public have not been satisfied (b) drug was not "reasonably affordable" to the public (c) patented invention was not worked in the territory of India.It seems highly unlikely that an application for compulsory license has already been made by a generic manufacturer, so most probably the government has explored the option of compulsory licensing under Section 92. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Donna Boehme
With so much at stake, companies that fail to empower their CCOs could pay a steep price. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 10:55 am by Asher Bearman
”  Whether a trust is an “accredited investor” is a fact-specific determination, but generally speaking, the SEC has provided some guidance on trusts in the form of no-action letters and the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DI”).A revocable trust can be an accredited investor if: It has more than $5M in assets, it was not formed for the purpose of investing in the fund, and its trustee is a sophisticated person (under Rule 501(a)(7)); OR… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:45 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The Document Coordinator should manage the entire document production process, including: (a) being designated as the sole authorized person to accept a document request (always in writing) from OSHA; (b) coordinating with company and third party representatives to gather responsive documents; (c) reviewing documents for responsiveness, and to determine whether they contain privileged or business confidential information; (d) processing the documents with Bates and… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
§ 78p(b), requiring corporate insiders to disgorge profits earned from certain purchases and sales of their company’s securities that take place within a six month period, applies only to purchases and sales of the same equity security of the company. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  I hope all of you had an enjoyable holiday season – whether spent in the company of loved ones, engaging in recreational pursuits, or just contemplating an exciting new work year. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 11:14 am by Corrine M. Fiesel
The principal purposes of the Paper are to: (a) present the potential risks associated with listing emerging market issuers (“EMIs”) that have been identified by the Exchanges; (b) provide preliminary guidance to issuers and their advisors with respect to listing considerations applicable to EMIs; and (c) solicit comments from market participants on matters related to listing EMIs, including possible new guidance or requirements that the Exchanges may implement. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm by WIMS
§§ 1501.4(b), 1506.6(c), we conclude that the agency record does not permit a reviewing court to determine whether a reasoned basis exists for the NRC's decision not to afford any such public involvement in the exemption decision. [read post]