Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 7761 - 7780 of 42,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 3:57 am
It does not actually mean you have a right to work, or any legal protection from being fired should you refuse to jump through employer hoops. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:50 am
Here are the 10 sales and marketing techniques I have learned from strippers: Sales Technique #1 - Give them something for nothingOne of the first things a stripper will do is come up to you and flirt with you. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
10/09/2007Angela Ray Andrews pleaded guilty Tuesday to killing her 10-year-old stepdaughter, Shelby, by locking the child in a too-tight closet space with so little breathing room that the panicked girl, who was pleading to be let out, choked on her own vomit.Andrews, 37, pleaded guilty to first-degree felony murder. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:47 pm by Christine Wilton
An example would be whether tithing is a reasonable expense is a question of fact (In re Lovell, No. 10-02702; Lovell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Id. at *6-7 (text added).The Absence of an Embodiment Does Not Limit Plain and Ordinary Meaning[The] disclosed embodiment undisputedly uses a cable to convey data, and the patent does not disclose an alternative embodiment that uses a wireless datalink. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 11:52 am by Dennis Crouch
  In particular, I was first surprised to see the final element of the claim written as an “optional” limitation: 1. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:40 am by Erica Newland
Last week, the Pakistani government announced that it does not intend to amend the blasphemy law. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
(v) If the answer to paragraph (iv) is in the affirmative, does Article 10 of Directive 2006/115 permit Member States to exempt hotel operators from the obligation to pay ‘a single equitable remuneration’ on the grounds of ‘private use’ within the meaning of Article 10(1)(a) of Directive 2006/115? [read post]