Search for: "English v. English" Results 7761 - 7780 of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2022, 11:03 am by Evan Schwartz
Rider involved an 18-year-old with limited ability to read English. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Comments on Football Dataco Ltd v Brittens Pools Ltd [2010] EWHC 841 (Ch) on whether the football fixture lists arranged and published by the English and Scottish football organisations were protected by copyright or database right. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In Optis v Apple, Meade J explained that the date of hand-down itself is not necessarily confidential. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
No time to rebrand as 21 week delay to injunction refusedCombe International LLC v Dr August Wolff GmbH [2022] EWHC 125 (Ch) (January 2022)We covered the hoo-ha between VAGISIL and VAGISAN in the last volume. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am by Guangjian Tu
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Earlier this year, Justice Perell approved a replacement class representative in Sondhi v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
The Oxford English Reference Dictionary 2d Ed (1996) defines zeal as “earnestness or fervor in advancing a cause or rendering a service” (with zealous defined as “full of zeal”). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
It's too easy to say we disbelieve an artist's purpose, as in Koons v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]