Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 7761 - 7780 of 16,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Casi la mitad de las escuelas privadas, incluyendo las universidades, se denominan como organizaciones “sin fines de lucro”. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
You can be fined for using the wrong version of the form so pay attention (and don’t click and download on this version: it’s not one of the fancy, scannable ones). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am by Juan C. Antúnez
” - Kurt Lewin “Having a fine old name really has been enough for me. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Ray Dowd
  Prosecutors too dumb to follow the money or too interested in taking easy cases that won't offend anyone wealthy.https://www.scribd.com/doc/258811543/Second-Circuit-Meyer-v-University-of-Oklahoma-Art-Law#fullscreen=1  www.dunnington.com Copyright law, fine art and navigating the courts. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/COrH6DkDjn -> Defamation in the Blogosphere: Baglow v Smith | snIP/ITs http://t.co/ZmKqsfc6qv -> Canada Levies $1.1Mn Fine for Spamming http://t.co/bDVHjVcdEb -> Copyright framework could 'ultimately weaken' EU http://t.co/92GvSCsao5 -> Copyright reform or cultural nightmare? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by John C. Manoog III
Lawsuit Filed in California At least partially in response to the senator’s report, a class action lawsuit (Cahen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
However, several factors combine to tilt him away from taking this approach alone: these include (i) the sheer complexity of the mechanisms for operating the proposed system which will be as hard to amend and fine-tune as it has been to establish in the first place, (ii) its plainly divisive nature, (iii) the absurdly convoluted structure for litigating unitary patents and matters relating to them, (iv) the fact that the realities relating to the satisfactory governance of the European… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:11 am by Florian Mueller
At the end of the week before the one in which the trial was scheduled to start, the Federal Circuit affirmed Judge Posner's claim construction of the '647 patent in an Apple v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:48 pm by Michael Froomkin
Unlike Group V, where I went in with absolutely no idea how I was going to vote (see Report on Group V Debate — Six Candidates), I came to this debate with some views about both candidates. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
(By the way, that’s a fine excuse to note the most important constitutional development of the week: As great and significant as the Court’s analysis on Article III standing was in Monday’s landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]