Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm
She was named Director of the Human Trafficking Unit at the State Attorney's Office. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:45 pm
Esprit IP Limited v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:40 am
The Collected Essays are I Reason in Action, II Intention and Identity, III Human Rights and Common Good, IV Philosophy of Law, V Religion and Public Reasons. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm
Rodriquez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
See Koutroulis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am
” At Good Judgment, Ryan Adler invites court-watchers to forecast the result in Gamble v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
United Kingdom (2009) 48 EHRR 50, at [66]; Von Hannover v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 8:20 am
Compared to the definitions from Nguyen or the Second Circuit’s Meyer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:33 am
In 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
About a month ago we posted on a New Jersey intermediate appellate decision, Hoffman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In 2006, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Scotch Whisky Association v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Interestingly, he noted: “[I]n a modern society the state has very extensive powers of keeping records on its citizens. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
State, 2013 WL 5636375 (Tex. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
e360Insight, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:09 am
Nov. 17, 2023). 2Id. 3First Baptist Church of Iowa Louisiana v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
See MeUndies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The Board was therefore correct to find that the level of attention of the relevant public was normal [Katnote: believe it or not, the goods in question, which are deemed to be 'goods for everyday consumption' and not luxury goods in the absence of evidence to the contrary, include 'jewellery, precious stones, precious metals, goods coated in precious metals'].Distinctiveness of the image of a polo player and the words ‘polo club’… [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm
Smart folks are still trying to work out whether the Herring case decided last week by the US Supreme Court narrowing the exclusionary rule is a big deal or a little one, and several good blog posts by attorneys have helped me think about the issue more concretely.Kent Scheidegger even thinks "Herring may be setting the stage for the Holy Grail -- overruling Mapp v. [read post]
