Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 7761 - 7780 of 16,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 9:15 am
Take the case I read the other day, Goodrich v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:04 am by Nate Cardozo
And we hope this lawsuit will put an end to the practice, once and for all. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 1:32 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
If you file a claim in a court (or an arbitral tribunal) for liquidated damages and furnish some evidence, you can only hope to god on whether the court will award you the said amount. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:14 am by Florian Mueller
As I wrote in the context of yesterday's decision by a German appeals court to stay a Motorola v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
  My hope is that this includes officials within IP Australia and the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, and that the decision will be duly appealed to a Full Bench of the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:37 pm
  Several potentially defense-friendly provisions caught our attention:             Definition of Prescription Medical Device            Title V of the draft is entitled “Modernizing Medical Product Regulation. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Christiana Wayne
Christiana Wayne shared the Supreme Court’s ruling in Van Buren v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:27 pm by Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie
This is the principal question that the Court of Appeal was asked in the case of Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 1:38 am by Jani Ihalainen
We remain to see whether the CJEU follow the Advocate General's opinion, and this writer for one, hopes they do.Source: IPKat [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Larry
The important legal and possibly philosophical question to be answered in Mondelez Global LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Brooke
Igo's The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America, Cyrus Farivar's Habeas Data: Privacy vs. the Rise of Surveillance Tech, Mary Ziegler's Beyond Abortion: Roe v. [read post]