Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 7761 - 7780
of 62,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
The above is a fictional caption, but it looks like we’re heading that way after lawsuits filed this week across our Litigation Nation. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:12 am
One of the things that's always struck me about this project, we're looking at a maximum of $300 million that is invested, but when you look at the payback, per year, on a 50-year study on this, the state will be getting back $300 million a year on the assets that will be moving down this track, so it's a no brainer. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Kunda, however, re-entered the property and evicted the Plaintiffs, and essentially took back over operations of the store. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:11 am
But while vulnerabilities are plentiful, they’re not uniformly distributed. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:02 pm
Can't challenge validity, we're told. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:22 pm
Jimenez recused himself and then said ASA Angelica Zayas had (and we're not making this up) "Stabbed me in the back. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
We’re a law school. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:28 am
The district court found that the 2002 Stipulation was a diligent prosecution for privity purposes, and therefore dismissed plaintiffs' suit on res judicata grounds. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:52 am
A friend sent along yesterday the case of In re Gary Ronald Perez, 30 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir., 1994). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
A little over a week after the Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:01 pm
The majority of the opinion, both before and after that holding, addresses other grounds for denying the motion, and simply serves to "express doubt" as to various County defenses.That's a fairly long time to talk about issues that you're not actually deciding. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:44 pm
Clearly he doesn't get paid for the day, and maybe, if you're somewhat mean, you suspend him for a week, and maybe even tell him that if he does it again, the penalty will be more severe. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 am
As usual, our talented crew of LII Supreme Court Bulletin editors has analyzed the cases — just click on the casenames for a careful exploration of what they’re about: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 09-1205 SMITH, KEITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
Lord v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
In CG v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:47 am
Case C-101/08 - Audiolux SA and Others v Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA (GBL) and Others, and Bertelsmann AG and Others According to the European Court of Justice, in its decision of 15 October 2009, community law does not include any general principle of law under which minority shareholders are protected by an obligation on the dominant shareholder, when acquiring or exercising control of a company, to offer to buy their shares under the same conditions as those agreed when a shareholding… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 12:48 pm
As many people suspected there are several unresolved issues regarding the final State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:29 pm
Noonan -- The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
The case is Bellevue School Dist. v. [read post]
