Search for: "John Doe - 1" Results 7761 - 7780 of 14,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by John L. Welch
All that is required to secure a filing date are: (1) The name of the applicant; (2) A name and address for correspondence; (3) A clear drawing of the mark; (4) A listing of the goods or services; and (5) The filing fee for at least one class of goods or services.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A law school casebook assignment is thus more than an exercise in SAT-like reading comprehension; it is an invitation for you, the reader, to ask questions such as: How does what is said here compare to what is said elsewhere? [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
   The Republicans are setting a trap, giving them grounds to impeach the President, no matter what he does. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Whitney Fair at (213) 617-5436. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
In my prior post on the Poole case I noted a 1994 law review article by the late Professor John Ronayne comparing NYULPA and NYRLPA. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 10:11 am by Cooper, Adel & Associates
Answer:  Title to property in your living trust should normally be as set out as follows:  “John Doe, Trustee of the John Doe Family Trust UTA 1/1/2008. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:12 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So, although it remains true that "the John McCain episode is really quite interesting," the reason is not what I suggested. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is important to ensure the technical meaning does not override the need to restrain the meaning within a legal context. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:53 am by azatty
John Phelps, CEO/Executive Director, State Bar of Arizona WHEN: Tuesday, August 20, 2013, Noon to 1:15 p.m. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:53 am by azatty
John Phelps, CEO/Executive Director, State Bar of Arizona WHEN: Tuesday, August 20, 2013, Noon to 1:15 p.m. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am by Sandy Levinson
  Similarly, if push comes to shove, he can announce an amnesty for everyone who entered the country illegally prior to, say, January 1, 2012 or everyone who has overstayed a visa (which I gather "explains" far more "illegal aliens" than does initial illegal entry). [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the Court of Appeals itself, in the recent case urges just such a view, stating in a per curiam opinion: "(1) the doctrine of Stare decisis does not, of course, demand unyielding resignation to even recent precedent. [read post]