Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 10,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 4:45 am
However, his his tests are not strong enough to reject non-agency-cost explanations.Coates shows that the existence and amount of firms’ corporate political activity negatively correlates with (1) shareholder democracy variables and (2) corporate value as measured by Tobin’s Q. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
If the questions are relevant, the court must then consider the four Wigmore factors: (1) the relationship must originate in a confidence that the source’s identity will not be disclosed; (2) anonymity must be essential to the relationship in which the communication arises; (3) the relationship must be one that should be sedulously fostered in the public interest; and (4) the public interest served by protecting the identity of the informant… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
One way to approach this question is via a typology--a scheme that divides the general and abstract concept of justice into component parts: (1) distributive justice, (2) corrective justice, (3) political justice, and (4) procedural justice. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
1. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:31 am
The three substantive policy proposals that made it onto the show were: (1) defense cuts, (2) Social Security cuts, and (3) a $1 increase in the federal gas-tax. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:45 am
(2) The future of the federal estate tax is in a state of suspense, but is it an issue in the midterm elections? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
Waldrip, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Respondent): John M. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:30 am
Type 2 is where an international lawyer incorporates insights from another discipline (often gleaned from a Type 1 study described above) in a book or article still aimed primarily at other international lawyers. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:38 pm
1. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:50 am
Al-Kidd, No. 10-98, limited to Questions 1 and 2 in the certiorari petition. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:24 am
2. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:01 pm
So, what does a good proposal look like? [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
2.) [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:32 pm
While this is laudable on its thought, in practicality it does not work. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:10 am
He does not know when to stop blabbing away, misleading investors, and lying to the media – even during an ongoing SEC investigation of his antics.?? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Does it Matter? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
Instead, the discussion was on (1) whether the state court's order was a disposition on the merits at all, as opposed to on procedural default; and (2) the merits of the ineffective assistance claim, with lots of fact-intense discussion about blood pools and high velocity spatter.It appears possible that the Supreme Court could just go straight to the merits of the underlying claim and say there was effective assistance or no prejudice and leave all the other questions… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm
[3] John E. [read post]
