Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 7761 - 7780 of 7,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
"Metropolitan Library System E-nnounce 1, no. 3 (Feb. 21)C|net news, Mar. 2 Those who want to see all of the library news items can go to: http://link.ixs1.net/s/ve? [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:59 am
" Whelan's and McConnell's plausible responses (I hope I'm doing them justice, and I'm blending the best points of both here) are that (1) the 1860s Congress voted to desegregate but was stopped by a filibuster, (2) the authors and supporters of the 14th were very racially progressive "radical Republicans," so they likely did mean to impose quite a broad requirement of "Equal Protection," and (3) even if it wasn't clear in… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 1:49 am
Or you might think of it as 3 million times the information in all the books ever written, according to IDC. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 11:49 am
Not unlike the 3/1, 5/1, 7/1 and other variations on this theme that also have been around for years. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:26 am
Any one with questions or concerns regarding this bill may call Workers' Compensation Alliance Co- Chairs Troy Rosasco at 631-582-3700 x123 or John Sciortino at 585-475-1100. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:09 am
Business Intelligence Business Intelligence: What It Takes and What It Does (Law Tech news, 2/21/07) by BI expert John Alber of Bryan Cave is an excellent analysis and explanation of BI for law firms. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:13 pm
The rough and ready balance does not hold, and you either wind up with an (unfulfillable) utopianism of rights or else a shrugging off of rights and a commitment to win.3. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Objections (2) and (3) are hard to take seriously. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Let's say that John Doe, a senior master sergeant in the Air Force, is being sued for divorce and military pension division by Mary Doe, his wife. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
As observant IPKat readers may have noticed, there has been a flurry of activity at the UK Patent Office in recent months regarding 'excluded' subject matter under section 1(2) of the Patents Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
It does call the Duke students "perfect offenders. [read post]