Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Piniero, 849 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2017), a case I am proud to say I briefed at the appellate level. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:11 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
Credit Union v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
Credit Union v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:52 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (PA State Police). [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 8:25 am
The NJWDC claim was dismissed at the hearing level for lack of jurisdiction, and no appeal was taken, citing Williams v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:19 pm
In Morris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm
A165040 For the appellate brief: https://eff.org/document/williams-v-sf-appeal-brief For more on this case: https://www.eff.org/cases/williams-v-san-francisco For more on police spying technology: https://www.eff.org/issues/street-level-surveillance Contact: SairaHussainStaff Attorneysaira@eff.org [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Arkinson, in which a unanimous SCOTUS assured us that if a bankruptcy court is confronted with a state law issue masquerading as a “core” issue—such as, in this case, a fraudulent transfer lawsuit—that invokes the specter of Stern v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
See Mazza v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
However, unlike Rocky V, what a great story it would be. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:59 pm
See Oakville Hills Center, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:43 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Where an employer’s behaviour dips below a threshold level of decency during the course of a termination, the employer may find itself exposed to “moral damages. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:42 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Intamin, LTD. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Several weeks ago, we published a CCPA FAQS on Cookies, which provides a high-level look at how the impending CCPA may apply to website cookies. [read post]
