Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 7761 - 7780 of 18,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 9:15 am by Doorey
 And it doesn’t: As a matter of principle I am of the view that it would be rare that the government could rely on its “consultation” conduct after the fact of legislation declared invalid based on its breach of a s. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
Personally, I think someone’s taking Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash a little too seriously, but as I said, I’m old. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:58 am
” […] The heart of the government’s case became clear last week: 12 hours of FBI interviews with Ahmed. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:24 am
Anyone trying to impress a friend with the perfect combination of songs can probably burn a CD or assemble an MP3 playlist in a matter of minutes. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:28 am by admin
For further information regarding home buyer’s legal rights, see “Free Legal Resources” at WNY-Lawyers.com. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
(Transcript of hearing 09/09/2009, at p. 51; emphasis added. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
The Supreme Court began its analysis of the issues before it by explaining that[c]ertiorari is an extraordinary remedy that is not granted as a matter of right, but rather at the court's discretion. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:26 pm
Gonzales' decision, it's a matter for the president as to whether the president will retain the attorney general or not. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To the extent that Hill’s affidavit annexes a proposal purportedly accepted ·by plaintiffs, the proposal is unsigned and does not establish a defense, as a matter of law, to plaintiffs’ claims of malpractice (Exhibit 1 to Hill Affidavit). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:34 am by Peter
See p. 4: "The Directive applies horizontally across all areas of law which touch on the provision of information society services, regardless of whether it is a matter of public, private, or criminal law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:20 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Indeed, I doubt too many professorial eyebrows did not rise after reading this on p. 5 of the slip op.: "Jones's Fourth Amendment rights do not rise or fall with the Katz formulation. [read post]