Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 7761 - 7780 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2022, 9:21 am by Dennis Crouch
Brewery has not yet filed its petition for writ of certiorari, but it did recently petition the Surpeme Court for an extension of time and that document included the following: This case presents a substantial and important question of federal law: what must a party show to have Article III standing to appeal an adverse judgment from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit? [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Richard Hasen writes that one of the most significant opinions of the decade, in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:48 pm
United States, as the case is now called, has been consolidated with a related case, Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Circuit Court on the question of their plea to be released and allowed to live, at least temporarily, in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
The Department asked the court to dismiss Murphy's petition. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:18 am by Anna Christensen
Petitioner Jose Angel Carachuri-Rosendo was born in Mexico and obtained lawful permanent residency after immigrating to the United States as a child. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
As of 2013, according to the UCLA’s Williams Institute, there were about 130,000 same-sex marriages in nineteen states across the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 10-3623), the circuits are also split. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:36 am by Gregg Fisch and Rachel Landauer
Then, following the Court of Appeal’s refusal to stay the matter, the challengers now are seeking the United States Supreme Court’s intervention on the issue. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]