Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 12,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Palmer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
In Interstate Specialty Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:20 am
Professor Zamora Cabot continues his line of research on the subject of multinational enterprises liability with this article (ckick here to download), where he raids into a field of the out-most concern, such as that of land grabbing, over the very significant case Mubende-Neumann. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:57 pm
The defendant was asked to recite the alphabet from "C" to "V". [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
First articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:00 am
Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Boston University) & Boryana Madzharova (University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Economics), Leveling the International Playing Field with the Marketplace Fairness Act; Quill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm
-William Brennan: He receives an extra push from me because I'm a voting rights guy, and he pretty much started the field with Baker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:24 pm
Walters v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:53 am
Although it's been nearly 90 years since the Scopes Monkey Trial and 45 years since the Supreme Court overturned a state ban on teaching evolution in public schools in Epperson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:43 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Vance v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
Supreme Court will rule in the Bilski v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
As for the question of discrimination in field of technology:Aside from mandating the three requirements for patentable subject matter (new, inventive step, and capable of industrial application), Art 27.1 mandates that “…patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology… ” and “…without discrimination as to … the field of technology…”. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:22 am
Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO surveys fields as diverse as climate change mitigation, non-communicable diseases, nanotechnology and public health care. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:14 am
Samet v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
