Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 9:47 am
United Site Services of California, Inc., Case No. 12-CV-00318-LHK (N.D. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
And yes, the Court is indeed holding United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:09 am
However, there was a subsequent change in the law when the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bullock v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Ornelas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:49 am
Samsung points to the January 2011 Federal Circuit decision in Uniloc v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:45 am
See also United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
ABTO and MZTO were both United States' citizens. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
In Atlantic Marine Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:50 am
In Ritchie v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
United States (1939) 308 U.S. 271, and United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:20 pm
Tice v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California 2013). [read post]
Google makes itself ridiculous, tells appeals court something Microsoft can disprove with transcript
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Three weeks ago I was thoroughly disappointed that Samsung's lawyers had told Judge Koh in the Northern District of California that Apple had no more options let to salvage a patent but to file a notice of appeal, which was plain wrong: the official communication by the USPTO that Samsung submitted to the court stated clearly that Apple did have other options. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in a medical device patent case and found that the defendant had a meritorious patent exhaustion defense. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed, and held that the amended complaint was too ambiguous as to which affirmative agency actions required EPA to consult about trifluralin before registering it. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
Circuit, in an opinion by Senior Judge Silberman, reversed, in United States v. [read post]
