Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7761 - 7780
of 37,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Contact: Please answer the call by way of e-mail to the organizers stating the subject “Call for papers”, c/o Prof. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:53 pm
There's a fight about the degree to which Section 14201 of the Elections Code requires the California Secretary of State to post facsimile ballot materials in languages other than English. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
Before issuing its judgment, the Commercial Court of Barcelona referred a preliminary ruling to the CJEU, which gave rise to the Judgment of 20 December 2017 (case C-291/16). [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Hearing Officer upheld the denial of Petitioner's applications and he filed an appeal to the State Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Hearing Officer upheld the denial of Petitioner's applications and he filed an appeal to the State Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Hearing Officer upheld the denial of Petitioner's applications and he filed an appeal to the State Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Hearing Officer upheld the denial of Petitioner's applications and he filed an appeal to the State Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
I’m then joined by my colleague Professor Jeremy DeBeer to discuss the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
R. 5.3 (c)(3). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Tran’s prior work Two Years After Alice v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:43 am
By James V. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
State Constitution Protection for Free Speech Censorship enthusiasts love citing the California Supreme Court Pruneyard v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Judges have been known to create exceptions not explicitly stated in a statute to avoid absurd results. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
American Guardian Holdings, 16 C 11039 (Aug. 22, 2019). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
