Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 14,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
The respondents have now filed their merits briefs in the two much-anticipated cell phone search cases that the Supreme Court will hear on April 29, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The so-called mandate, which was the subject of the much discussed NFIB v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:29 pm
Federal labor law does not apply to those who work for state or local governments, such as a state university. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
There are many United States constitutional rights which a person loses upon imprisonment for a felony conviction. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:33 am
If you read today’s New York Daily News (or Post for that matter), the answer to these questions was a resounding NO in the case of Schacter v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:30 pm
Chairman, I apologize for losing my temper,” he said. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:18 pm
Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia is (in)famous in patent circles for calling patent law “gobbleydegook” during the KSR v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
(v) Decide issues involving the validity of a TSA regulation, order, or other requirement under the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:07 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:53 am
In Gutierrez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Small Justice LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Xcentric Ripoff Report Sues Blogger, Loses on Jurisdictional Grounds–Xcentric Ventures v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
Generally, when a litigant loses a trial, our system of justice provides for a second look; the trial judge is not the final word in any given case.When a losing litigant becomes an appellant, the case is assigned, in both state and federal courts, to a 3-judge panel to decide the matter via majority vote. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
The Texas case is Batiste v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Played that role even before Folsom v. [read post]
