Search for: "State v. So" Results 7761 - 7780 of 117,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Relying pre-COVID pandemic on the judiciary’s dependably and excessively expansive application of the century-old Jacobson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar's argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
” In so holding, the court considered and then rejected the Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Until the expiration of the federal PHE, set for May 11, 2023, the DEA has allowed DEA-registered practitioners to operate under an emergency waiver so they could prescribe controlled substances without ever having conducted an in-person visit with the patient, provided other criteria were satisfied (including that the practitioner conducted an evaluation of the patient via telemedicine using a synchronous, two-way, audio-visual communications device). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:42 am by CMS
In this post, Ingrida Jakuseva, a paralegal within the Litigation and Arbitration department at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and Anor. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Justice Neil Gorsuch noted that a majority of the Court had granted state standing in Department of Commerce v. [read post]