Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
Sorry, ambitious state attorneys general. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
“ Thurgood Marshall in 1957 On September 15, 1959, Boynton filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
However, in 2012, the Court decided in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Taylor (CVSG 1/14/2008) (Akin Gump for petitioner) (settling FMLA claims) No. 07-543, AT&T v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:56 am
United States, 516 U.S. 163 (1996). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
New Child Support Standards Chart released April 1, 2012 According to the Child Support Standards Chart, [LDSS 4515 (4/12)] released April 1, 2012, prepared by New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Division of Child Support Enforcement, the 2012 poverty income guideline amount for a single person as reported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services is $11,170 and the 2012 self-support reserve is $15,080. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States denied Bell's petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Arguing for petitioners, Kenneth W. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am
” Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The federal government’s arguments Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston argued for the United States in support of Egbert. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am
” Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 7-2 that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban, Steve Vladeck, counsel for the petitioners, writes for the Harvard Law Review Blog that the case &ldq [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:52 am
In an action by the SEC, however, the government asserts that the transnational nature of a fraudulent scheme is relevant only insofar as it has a sufficient connection to the United States to bring it within section 10(b)’s substantive prohibition. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:09 am
United States.) [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
