Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California 2013). [read post]
Google makes itself ridiculous, tells appeals court something Microsoft can disprove with transcript
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Three weeks ago I was thoroughly disappointed that Samsung's lawyers had told Judge Koh in the Northern District of California that Apple had no more options let to salvage a patent but to file a notice of appeal, which was plain wrong: the official communication by the USPTO that Samsung submitted to the court stated clearly that Apple did have other options. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in a medical device patent case and found that the defendant had a meritorious patent exhaustion defense. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed, and held that the amended complaint was too ambiguous as to which affirmative agency actions required EPA to consult about trifluralin before registering it. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
Circuit, in an opinion by Senior Judge Silberman, reversed, in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 18 (1971); Lewis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court's June 26 decisions in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm
The Wells Fargo choice-of-law paragraph states as follows: This Agreement and your account, as well as our rights and duties and your rights and duties regarding this Agreement and your account, will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the United States and, to the extent applicable, the law of the State of South Dakota, regardless of where you reside or use your account at any time. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
United States) on for background noise. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court in 2006, held that public employee speech made pursuant to “official duties” does not have First Amendment protection, and cannot form the basis for a retaliation claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At ACSblog, Erwin Chemerinsky discussed Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:49 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Herb Reed Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
In Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:30 pm
In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
