Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
In one of their briefs to the Supreme Court (here), the district argues that, among other reasons, the election of Barack Obama shows that the United States political arena has changed drastically from the one that existed when the VRA was passed in 1965. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
The cases will almost certainly be heard in April and you can see the orders list here. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
Beaty (07-1090) and Iraq v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:32 am
Martin will now ask to have her case heard by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Together, Whole Foods and Wild Oats operated 300 of the approximately 34,000 supermarkets in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
In J.G. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
” The court, however, rapidly rejected this argument, noting that the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:33 am
In the Constitution of the United States, they (corporations) are delegated no authority to make our laws and define our culture. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:12 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:31 pm
(That case was U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
Miller, No. 08-0580/AR (granted 9 Oct); United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
All other charges are to be heard by a single hearing officer. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:53 pm
In upholding the New York Law which permits grandparents, under certain circumstances, to seek visitation with their grandchildren, the Court distinguished the New York law from the overly broad Washington law struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Troxel v Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:47 pm
Several persons claiming to be victims of the crime charged in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
In murder for hire trial, testimony that another person asked if declarant knew anyone who could complete the murder was admissible as a verbal act; any error in admitting the statement was harmless based on other evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
