Search for: "A. T." Results 761 - 780 of 881,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Reference in this regard was made to decision T 613/10 (see the decision under appeal, reasons 3.1).2.3 The opposition division concluded that the requirements of Rule 76(2)(c) EPC were not met (see reasons 4).The board's position3. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:25 am
Louis found that often women aren’t helping others break through the glass ceiling. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:08 pm
Effective January 1, 2023, the Illinois SAFE-T Act is set to eliminate cash bail in Illinois. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:32 pm by Daily Record Staff
Maryland 529, formerly College Savings Plans of Maryland, announced Friday that T. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:47 am by Thomas Pyles
Side impact collisions, commonly known as “T-bone” accidents, account for approximately 25% of all car accidents. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Romano Beitsma
Discussing the case law, including T 0641/00 (Comvik) and T 1227/05 (Infineon), the Board distinguishes two different approaches. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, a transfer of the party status in the course of the proceedings can only be effective when the Board has been requested before the Board to register the legal succession and when the corresponding evidence has been filed (see T 19/97 [5]) – something that could only be done by the [opponent].[7.3] Pursuant to A 104(1) EPC 1973 each party to the opposition proceedings shall meet the costs it has incurred unless a different apportionment of costs is ordered “for reasons… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
A kind colleague has informed me that Board 3.3.01 has now issued its final decision in case T 584/09.In this case the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent in amended form.In its first decision, dated February 3, 2011, Board 3.3.01 revoked the patent.The Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA), in its decision R 21/11, set aside the decision because the deciding Board had not been aware of a request (to admit expert opinion D27) and, therefore, had ignored… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 361/08 [13]).The admission of a request for reimbursement of further search fees that had been paid would lead to the Board dealing with the corresponding questions for the first time in appeal proceedings or remitting the case to the first instance (A 111(1)). [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Samantha Schillings’ car went through the other stop sign, causing a T-bone collision with the vehicle in which Taylor was sitting. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
”When his case got dismissed by the New York County Supreme Court, M.G. appealed.On its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, thought that the guy didn’t have much of a case because there had been “probable cause” to arrest him – which was a “complete defense” to his claims. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
(It characterized a “sua sponte” dismissal as a power that should be used “sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances,” which weren't present here.)Interestingly, the AD1 also indicated that it was inappropriate for the judge to conclude that the case was time-barred. [read post]