Search for: "AT&T Mobility, LLC" Results 761 - 780 of 1,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 4:29 am by SHG
This isn’t to say that the safety otherwise programmed into the grandma-mobile won’t save thousands of lives. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm by Greg Mersol
Second, during the course of the case, Uber changed its driver agreements to take advantage of the decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:10 am
., HTC Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Kyocera Corporation, Boost Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and ZTE (USA), Inc. filed a motion to stay pending resolution of an inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding the class action wavier enforceable under the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark is President of John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, a data breach response and digital compliance firm. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
The petition for certiorari, filed by DIRECTV, asks the Court to determine whether the appeals court decision created a conflict with the Ninth Circuit and ran contrary to the Court’s 2011 holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 446-47 (2006), quoting People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
With the recent flash flood of precedential decisions from the TTAB, we haven't had a TTAB Test in a while. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By David Grosby and Michael Borella -- On September 23, 2010, Eon filed suit against seventeen defendants in the District Court of the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
July 15, 2015 - 11 AM: In re Johnson & Johnson, Serial No.77684321 [Refusal to register the mark BEST FOR BABY for "Toiletries, namely, baby bath skin cleansers and washes, and baby lotion," on the ground that applicant's specimens do not establish trademark use.]July 21, 2015 - 2 PM: In re Epiq Systems, Inc., Serial Nos. 85979129 and 85978692 [Refusal to register the marks DMX MOBILE and DOCUMATRIX MOBILE for "Consulting in the field of technical support… [read post]