Search for: "Adoption of L. J." Results 761 - 780 of 2,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 12:11 pm by Elin Hofverberg
All civil and religious services, including funerary services are suspended (art. 1(1)(i)); Closes all museums and cultural institutions (art. 1(1)(l)); and Permits commercial activities on the condition that managers guarantee public access on a contingent basis avoiding the gathering of persons, and enforcing the obligation of any person to keep at least one meter of distance from each other (art. 1(1)(o)). [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
In a prior post (here) we passed along a call for written inputs circulated by the Working Group for Business and Human Rights to be considered by the Working Group in the preparation of its Report on the theme "Connecting the business and human rights and anti-corruption agendas. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Elle a toutefois adopté une approche différente en ce qui concerne les délibérés en cour d’instance, qui peuvent constituer des événements distincts et être déduits du délai à ce titre. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” President Donald J. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Act § 1055 was amended by adding a new subdivision (j). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
This exception applies “where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted” Court applied same bifurcated standard of review as has been developed for the unusual circumstances exception – whether the project is located in a particularly sensitive environment is a substantial evidence question; but the question of impact based on such a location is a fair argument question… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
And theatres can have performances of songs from Noël Coward’s London Calling! [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Hickman, University of Minnesota Law School The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld statutory provisions calling for agencies to adopt such regulations as are “reasonable,” “feasible,” “in the public interest,” or some equally vague term—leading many commentators to declare that the nondelegation doctrine is dead. [read post]