Search for: "Arizona v. California"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
In Coats v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
’ Arizona v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:36 pm
” Citing a recent opinion (Brooke v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:02 am
In Pressley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Michael Keefer of The Arizona Republic reports that the Court upheld a stay of execution issued by the Ninth Circuit for Edward Harold Schad of Arizona. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
From Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
Nevada v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
Only a minority of six states allow a “best interests” consideration in the Section 1911(b) “good cause” analysis, including Arizona, California, Indiana, Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.3Link to the text of the note In re Maricopa Cnty. [read post]
1 May 2021, 1:57 am
California. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:28 am
The CRIT was one of five tribes to have its water rights confirmed in the landmark case of Arizona v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
Guzman-Ibarez, No. 14-50142 (Fernandez with Bea; Fisher concurring and dissenting) --- The defendant in this case had been convicted of robbery and sentenced to four years in a California state prison. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Next week (September 24-26) the University of California, Santa Barbara hosts a conference titled "Beyond the New Deal Order. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
As the California Supreme Court explained in Collection Bureau of San Jose v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:47 pm
Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984), and Arizona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
