Search for: "Aske v. Aske"
Results 761 - 780
of 65,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 2:51 am
Court of Appeals you are referring to.In this case, City of Portland v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
Supreme Court in Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:46 am
As reported by Jurist, Tuesday the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to grant a stay beyond the current Feb. 9 effective date of a district court order in Searcy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:45 am
Denbow asked Ms. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:48 am
Such an issue was recently addressed by a Florida court in Knipp v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:09 am
In A.L. v V.T.L., the Family Court, Rockland County, was asked to consider the standard for changing a custody agreement that gave one parent final decision-making authority over health-related decision for the children. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
Criminal Procedure Double jeopardy; mistrials Where the prosecutor asked a question that elicited an answer that was not admissible, the district court should have held a hearing to inquire into the prosecutor's motivation in asking the question. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Perhaps most significantly, however, our book documents how, in Philadelphia Newspapers v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
In Elektra v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In one recent federal civil case, Bostick v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 7:27 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:57 am
Last week, in Blick v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:43 pm
As discussed by SCOTUSblog here, the DOJ on Monday asked the Supreme Court to rehear the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm
Cal.) in Doe v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:18 am
The Onion asks people on the street for their take: The U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
“[A] man of high ambitions … must face the loneliness of original work. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Public Deserves to See Secret Law Written by Office of Legal Counsel Washington, DC - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today asked the Supreme Court of the United States to weigh in on a long-standing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in which EFF sought to obtain a secret legal memo authorizing the FBI to obtain phone records without any legal process. [read post]
