Search for: "Attorney Goldstein" Results 761 - 780 of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 8:36 am by Lyle Denniston
[Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in McFadden. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
”  [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:22 am
Our own Tom Goldstein will moderate. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondent in this case. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Louis, the New Hot Spot for Litigation Tourists”), Reuters and more] “Trio of Soda Cases Test the Limits of Attorney-Driven Class Action Lawsuits” [Jeffrey B. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:59 pm
Massachusetts attorney Michael Goldstein writes about this issue in his Massachusetts Cyberlaw Attorney blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Kamala Harris, then Attorney General of California and now Senator from that state, did not fare well in court in such a campaign while in state office, but New York’s left-leaning Attorney General Eric Schneiderman seems to be enjoying better luck in a similar push. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
– Mechanical Engineering Patent Attorney or Agent Dority & Manning, P.A. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:02 pm by Ronald Mann
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:21 pm
At SCOTUSblog, Tom Goldstein reviews some of her civil appellate opinions, and notes that "Sotomayor has considered First Amendment issues relatively infrequently. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:09 am by Ronald Mann
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, was counsel on an amicus brief in support of Viking River Cruises in this case. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]