Search for: "BLUNT v. STATE"
Results 761 - 780
of 871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
An early case that included similar claims, Cahen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Because many Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race, and the pickup of these Nader voters would have given Gore more states. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:01 am
In addition, the EDPB states that informed consent pursuant to Chapter V of the CTR “responds to core ethical requirements of research projects deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and is primarily a measure to ensure the protection of the right to human dignity and the right to integrity of individuals under Article 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; it is not conceived as an instrument for data protection compliance. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The question arose because of a 1982 ruling by the Ninth Circuit in Kouba v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
(Indeed, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Oracle v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
The judgment is astonishingly blunt and in my view spot on. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:55 am
It was set out in the case of Kandel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
A slungshot rope that is shortened to forearm length and spun rapidly is an effective blunt force weapon. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
In fact, the European Court of Human Rights first used the term ‘SLAPP’ only as recently as 2022 in OOO Memo v Russia. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
In the second, Garcia-Lopez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
In the second, Garcia-Lopez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:32 am
For instance, in Pilgrim v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
In the relatively recent California state court decision of Walsh v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Chair Rodgers also noted the retreat from imposing undue burdens, stating that it removed guardrails essential to good governance. [read post]
