Search for: "BRUCE v. BRUCE" Results 761 - 780 of 3,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Bruce Markell discusses Czyzewski v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of the case comes from Bruce Vielmetti in USA Today and Sam Hananel at The Associated Press. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:16 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Bruce Ashley, No. 114.052 (Johnson)Direct appeal; First-degree felony murderSarah Ellen Johnson[Affirmed; Rosen; June 23, 2017]Failure to give accomplice cautionary instructionFailure to grant new trial (newly discovered evidence)Insufficient limiting instruction re: prior bad actsState v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Brian Dalton
Among the possible impending disruptors analyzed by Bruce MacEwen's Tomorrowland include the Big Four accounting firms grabbing market share from Biglaw. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Bruce Morrison (D-CT) introduced a legislative response, that would become known as the Lautenberg Amendment. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm by Bob Lawless
The Second Circuit currently has a pending case (Anderson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
March 17, noon-1 PM, Cato Institute: Debate on Murr v. [read post]