Search for: "Baker v. People"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Also, Orphan Drug exclusivity only applies to rare diseases (affecting less than 200,000 people in the US and fewer than 5 people per 10,000 in the EU) [and is] shorter than average patent protection (12 years). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Wisinski v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Wisinski v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
US v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Marshall (citing the same Justice Black opinion from Reid v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
Stewart Baker points to a provision in Congress’s continuing resolution that is the first serious attempt I have seen to punish (as opposed to rail against) China for its cybersecurity practices. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Indeed you might well think his last name were Malletier, just as people have last names such as Baker, Carpenter and Farmer, except that those names go quite a ways back to well before surnames got nailed down in Europe. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:28 am
The New York Court of Appeals has thrown out a conviction because the defendant's profanity did not create any public disturbance.The case is People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
For a while, there was a mismatch, but what happened was that courts began to understand that fabric designs weren’t going to give them what they needed to handle software, so they reached back to Baker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
Thus, in Baker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Flagship urls are all very well, said Robert, and can be highly memorable -- but the days of people typing them in full into their browsers are over and SEO can be expensive and its results unpredictable. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:13 am
The political question doctrine has been what I've called "doctrinalized" in Baker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Mark Baker said. [read post]
