Search for: "Baker v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 8:15 am
The court stated that an IEP is a snapshot not a retrospective. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
In Doe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:27 pm
Although Baker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Arzan Tarapore explained how India can help the United States check China’s rise in region. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
After several weeks, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 – Read judgment The general rule in civil law cases is that the loser pays the winner’s legal costs, even if the case settles before trial. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:50 am
Fund Corp., 18 NY3d 1, 10; Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 13 NY3d 599, 605; DiPalma v State of New York, 90 AD3d 1659; Pritchard v Tully Constr. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
First, I think Judge Sutton is most apt to accept the view that the Supreme Court’s 1972 summary refusal to hear an appeal in Baker v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Baker J simply made the relevant orders, whereas Binchy J handed down a full judgment explaining that section 27 was the reason why he refused to award the injunctions against the defamatory posts. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
[This is the third installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
If Baker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: A Smithsonian curator of medicine and science on Griswold v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm
As Sarah Jenkins and Jon Laramore of Faegre Baker Daniels discussed in this piece – the first one I have seen discussing the substance of this opinion – the Court held in Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am
Baker: The difference an Indigenous leader makes Wild horses, buffalo and the politics of belonging [read post]
