Search for: "Barnett v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
“The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:49 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have pla [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am
Barnette. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
United States, involving the federal harmless error rule, and Reichle v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:39 am
City of Chicago on behalf of leading constitutional scholars across the ideological spectrum, including Randy Barnett and Stephen Calabresi, urging the Supreme Court to hold that the right to bear arms is a privilege and immunity of national citizenship protected from state infringement by the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
From my point of view, this does not involve endorsing originalism for the reasons stated in previous posts. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law How might a new U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Barnette, “coerce uniformity of sentiment in support of [an] end [it believes to be] essential”; that in this democratic state, “[a]uthority is… to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
The only decision of note was Kanter v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
