Search for: "Black v. Jackson" Results 761 - 780 of 795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Black Former Probationary Teacher Loses Claims Of Racial Discrimination Filed Against City Schools Kenney v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:57 pm
Along with a sea of protestors clad in black T-shirts that read "Enough is Enough," Reverend Al Sharpton, Martin Luther King, III, and Jesse Jackson are here. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
Jackson "The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act does not pre-empt state regulation if it is nondiscriminatory and not unreasonably burdensome. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:32 pm
(See side graph) Niro v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:31 am
In 1993, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a virtually identical state law in Wisconsin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:37 pm
Because it is relevant to the question of mens rea -- whether the accused had the intent required for criminal liability (see Jackson v. [read post]