Search for: "Brady v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
(Case No. 07-1853cv), the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a Bankruptcy Code Provision [11 U.S.C. sec. 526(a)(4)] did not violate the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of attorney Zenas Zelotes. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
The United States Supreme Court held that a single violation of Brady obligations is not sufficient to create civil damages liabilities for a district attorney’s office under section 1983. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am by SHG
  Was this a joke of the sort that Wild Bill Douglas made when he wrote Brady v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am by John Floyd
  In 2013, a New York federal district court in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
Prior to the passage of the TCJA, the United States was one of six nations that had a worldwide corporate tax system. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
House of Representatives voted to overturn the D.C. gun ban in 2004 and again in 2005.Then, last March, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned the ban, giving gun rights advocates a major victory in their long battle over the restrictions.The ruling drew strong reaction from both sides of the gun control issue. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
An agent acting—albeit unconstitutionally—in the name of the United States possesses a far greater capacity for harm than an individual trespasser exercising no authority other than his own. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
An agent acting—albeit unconstitutionally—in the name of the United States possesses a far greater capacity for harm than an individual trespasser exercising no authority other than his own. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
An agent acting—albeit unconstitutionally—in the name of the United States possesses a far greater capacity for harm than an individual trespasser exercising no authority other than his own. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]